![]() |
AWAB Home Page![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
| Articles, editorial comment and stories here do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the AWAB Council or members. If you would like to share news, comments, thoughts and concerns through VOTO, you are encouraged to do so. Select the link at the bottom of this page to email an article. | |||||||
|
ARTICLES
Editorial Comment: by Chris Boisvert Rosa Parks who in 1955 was a catalyst in the civil rights movement died this week at the age of 92. Parks who refused to give up her seat to a black man on a segregated bus in Montgomery, Alabama, was jailed for her action. Her arrest led to a 381 day boycott of the bus system, organized by a then little know American Baptist minister, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. In the fifty years since Parks action, much has changed in America with regard to racism. Segregation ended in the 1950’s, African American’s were finally guaranteed the right to vote in the 1960’s and rules against interracial marriage were ended in all states by the 1970’s. Jump to the new millennium, 2005. All of a sudden, when judges rule to protect rights of American citizens who are a minority, or of a minority opinion, they are called “activist judges”. It is good that such packaging of everything by political spin doctors didn’t exist in the 50’s and 60’s or the rights of African Americans might be decades behind where they are now. I’m not implying that total equality had been achieved, far from it. I think there is some inherent racism that exists in many aspects of our society. However, we have made great strides. Judges are supposed to interpret the rule of law, rule when laws are in conflict with one another and when they are unjust to segments of our citizenry. But the cry from the rightwing whenever a judge makes a ruling that is contrary to what is believed by the far right, or what the far right believes is contrary to the majority of Americans, the judge is called an activist. Of course on items of race the political machines of both sides of the political isle would never accuse judges of legislating from the bench. But on matters of rights for millions of lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender Americans, the right has no problem drawing the line. It is dangerous to think in a society that the will of the majority should always triumph in decisions of law. It is only when the minority voices are protected that it allows for true democracy. We need to remember this and stop letting the rightwing political machine package court ruling this way. Inequality is inherently unequal under the law. AWAB Council Meets In Wisconsin
October
27-28, the Executive Director of AWAB,
Ken Pennings, and the Council will meet
in Madison, Wisconsin for a planning
retreat. Please keep us in your thoughts
and prayers as we journey to the upper
Midwest to strategize and plan the work
of AWAB over the coming year. A lot has
happened since the ABC/USA biennial
meeting in Denver in July. The American
Baptist Churches of the Pacific
Southwest has voted to withdraw from the
denomination. This past week, the West
Virginia Baptist Convention narrowly
voted to not withdraw from the ABC. The
point of contention for those wanting to
withdraw is over membership of AWAB
churches and acceptance of sexual
minority folks, any place within the
denominations.
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||